ristotle claims that having a moral character is a necessary condition for happiness, the corollary of which is that immoral people cannot be happy. Explain and evaluate Aristotle’s argument for this

1. Aristotle claims that having a moral character is a necessary condition for happiness, the corollary of which is that immoral people cannot be happy. Explain and evaluate Aristotle’s argument for this. Minimally, you should discuss why happiness is the ultimate goal for Aristotle, and how one acquires moral/immoral characteristic according to him. And finally, what is the connection between having a certain kind of character and happiness. Do you think Aristotle is correct or not? Why or why not?
2. Your papers must be 5-6 pages long Word Documents (1250-1500 words), 12” font, typed, double spaced, with 1”margings all around, and properly footnoted
3. NOTE: THE ONLY SOUCRE THAT WE ARE ABLE TO US IS THE BOOK MORAL REASONING BY DAVID R. MORROW I HAVE ATTACHED THE PDF
4. Introduction- talk about the problem Aristotle was trying to solve (what is human function and what is the purpose of it, how do we identify the ultimate human good, what does it take for a person to become a moral person) THESIS, and Methodology statement
The post ristotle claims that having a moral character is a necessary condition for happiness, the corollary of which is that immoral people cannot be happy. Explain and evaluate Aristotle’s argument for this ACADEMIC ASSISTERS. ACADEMIC ASSISTERS.

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

The post ristotle claims that having a moral character is a necessary condition for happiness, the corollary of which is that immoral people cannot be happy. Explain and evaluate Aristotle’s argument for this appeared first on First Class Essay Writers.