Discussions – PSY-200-H6060 Foundations of Addictions 22EW6

First, introduce yourself to the class. Include your major and anything you would like to share about yourself. Then address the prompt below.

Compare the 1960 disease model by Jellinek to one of the seven models discussed in your book.
The seven models you can choose from:

Moral model
Psychological model
Family model
Disease model
Biological model
Sociocultural model
Multi-causal model

Include the following in your discussion:

– Provide a statement of your personal definition of addiction (This is just how you see addiction and does not have to have any models of addiction to support it.).
– Include a brief overview of the 1960 disease model by Jellinek and the model you selected.
– Compare and contrast the 1960 disease model by Jellinek and the model you selected for their definition of addiction.

Respond to two of your peers’ definitions. How does your peer’s definition differ from your own? How is it similar?

To complete this assignment, review the


2-1 Discussion: Support Group

 11:59 PM. Submission restricted before availability starts.

In Module One, you researched support groups both online and in your local area. You are to attend one of these meetings and provide a summary of your experiences. Include in your summary the following information:

  • What type of meeting did you attend?
  • Why did you choose this meeting?
  • What types of addictions were discussed (give a general definition of these addictions)?
  • What was the format of the meeting (online or physical attendance)?
  • What were your expectations of the meeting?
  • What was your conclusion of the meeting?
  • What kind of impact does the addiction have on the individual, his or her family, workplace, and community?
  • What was the motivational level for getting help? Was there mention of support within their family?

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.


3-1 Discussion: Assessment Evaluation

  11:59 PM. Submission restricted before availability starts.

You have been asked to evaluate two assessments for the local mental health agency. The agency would like to know the following information:

  • The differences between using a structured, unstructured, and semi-structured assessment
  • What treatment-specific information should be in the assessment?
  • A brief review of the two assessment instruments that you choose:
    • ASI
    • AUDIT
    • AUI
    • CAGE
    • MST
    • MCMI
    • MMPI
    • PAI
    • SASSI-3
    • SASSI-2A
    • T-ACE
    • TWEAK

Respond to one peer who chose the same assessment instrument as you and one who chose a different one. Compare and contrast your answers.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.


4-1 Discussion: Hypothetical Case Study

 11:59 PM. Submission restricted before availability starts.

Tom, 45, occasionally went to the casino with some friends as a fun night out, but lately he noticed himself returning there on his own, spending hours at a time at a single blackjack table. His friends asked him about it, but he brushed off their concerns. As time passed, he spent more time at the casino and often lied to his wife about it.

Based on what you have learned in this module about motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioral restructuring, and solution-focused therapy, which approach or approaches do you think are most relevant for Tom’s situation?

Within your discussion, address the following points:

  • Define motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioral restructuring, and solution-focused therapy applied to addiction.
  • Based on what you have learned in this module, what are two techniques within each counseling style that you think might be relevant to Tom’s situation?
  • Why do you think the approach(es) you chose would be helpful in Tom’s situation (be specific and detailed)?

Once you have posted, respond to at least two classmates’ posts and discuss the best course of action for Tom.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.


5-1 Discussion: Hypothetical Case Study

 11:59 PM. Submission restricted before availability starts.

Julie uses heroin for her reported chronic pain. She states that if she does not take something for her pain, she becomes depressed and suicidal. She has agreed to see a counselor. She has also stated that she does not know anything about her treatment options but is willing to try any method to overcome her addiction and depression.

Based on what you have learned in this module, explain to her the advantages and disadvantages of the following techniques as well as the possible outcomes:

  • 12-step program
  • Group therapy
  • Behavioral contracting
  • Pharmacotherapy
  • Relapse prevention

Once you have posted, review at least two of your classmates’ posts. Read over their advantages/disadvantages and outcomes. Do you share the same? Discuss which options you think would be the best for Julie.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.


6-1 Discussion: Hypothetical Case Study

Submission restricted before availability starts.

Dan and Mary have one son, James, who is 15 years old. James has been caught stealing from the local market numerous times, and he took his parents’ car out for the evening without their permission. James still experiences neck pain from a car accident that he and his mother were involved in two years prior. You learn that he is taking prescription pain medication that is not prescribed, and you have also noticed that Mary comes to the sessions intoxicated. James states that he does not talk to his parents and that he uses the pain medication to help him cope with his family life.

  • Identify the roles that you see James, Dan, and Mary having in this family.
  • What behaviors do you think are related to Mary’s drinking?
  • What are the social, economic, and physiological factors that James presents due to his addiction?
  • Identify at least one factor that one of your peers made that is different from your own, and comment on it. Identify another peer who chose a similar factor, and compare and contrast your answers.


7-1 Discussion: Cultural Considerations

 Submission restricted before availability starts.

Counselors strive to create an environment where their clients feel comfortable and safe to discuss their issues. Taking into consideration how culture impacts the ability to build a trusting relationship, what are three factors or specific aspects of diversity that counselors should consider when working with clients from a different culture, who are of a different gender than you, or who are LGBT? Comment on two of your peers’ considerations that are different from the ones you discussed.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.


8-1 Discussion: Definition of Addiction

 11:59 PM. Submission restricted before availability starts.

You started this course eight weeks ago and provided your personal definition of addiction. Revisit your definition. Would you change your definition of addiction? Why or why not? If you would, state your new definition.

Visit the website of the Association for Addiction Professionals (NAADAC) and review the code of ethics and credentialing process for an addiction counselor. Choose one ethical area that you feel is especially important and one area that you think could be challenging for new or inexperienced addiction counselors. Comment on at least two peers’ definitions of addiction or ethical concerns.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.

4-2 Case Study Milestone Two: Short Paper

4-2 Case Study Milestone Two: Short Paper

3-2 Prevention Program Milestone One: Short Presentation

3-2 Prevention Program Milestone One: Short Presentation



Does she have a substance addiction like alcohol, prescriptions, or illicit drugs

simple assignment – excelsiorwriters.com

Mathematics – excelsiorwriters.com

Note1: Print off a copy of this Microsoft Word file and answer each question directly on your hard paper copy of these pages.

Note2: Hand in your answer to Q#1, Q#2, and Q#3 only.

Note 3: This assignment does NOT cover all the material that you are responsible for knowing in this course. You are, of course, responsible for the material covered in all readings, lectures, assignments, and practice problems

please use my Formula table.


safety and health Regulation InterpApp – excelsiorwriters.com

Science – excelsiorwriters.com


  1. Can wastes be incinerated at sea? (explanation)
  2. How have ocean protections improved since enactment of the 1972 MPRSA?
  3. Identify 3 locations on the map that is of interest to you where material disposal can be dumped (click on the blue link and follow directions) Ocean Disposal Map.

Click on this link to answer more questions:


  1. How is Ocean Disposal Site Monitored? (explain)
  2. What types of Data are Collected During Ocean Monitoring Surveys (explain)
  3. Is permit required for Ocean Dumping (how/explain)


Columbus State Community Individual and Communal Ethics Paper – excelsiorwriters.com

Business Finance – excelsiorwriters.com

  • Ethics in Organizations

    Attached Files:

  • Assignment

    Critical Thinking Assessment 3

    Attached Files:

    Critical Thinking – Learning Unit 3Purpose of the AssessmentDuring the course of this Learning Units, we have looked at Ethics in the Workplace from a number of different angles. Viewing the nature of employment, how individuals are treated in the workplace, rights to privacy, drug testing, and other issues are all relevant topics. The purpose of this assessment will focus on looking at ethical dilemmas from an Individual point of view or a Communal point of view.Goal of the AssessmentAfter reading the Ethics in Organization article, you will use your knowledge and skill set to assess how ethical dilemmas are treated at your current (or former) place of work.Components of the AssignmentsPart One

    1. Read the Ethics in Organizations article that is found in Blackboard, or via the following link (https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethics-in-organizations/)

    Part Two

    1. Provide analysis on what you believe to be the conclusions of Marvin Brown’s article. This question is purposely left open to your interpretation.
    2. Select one area of Employment Ethics to further explore. Privacy in the Workplace, Diversity, Affirmative Action, Drug Testing, are all valid choices but you may select anything that is of interest to you.
    3. Write about the topic from the Individual Point of View and then the Communal Point of View. Is there a best practice when it comes to implementing your topic of choice? Your analysis should include positives and negatives from each point of view, ranking of stakeholders, potential pitfalls, and how the topic has been implemented in the real world.


MKT220 CSU Business Marketing Research Method Case Study – excelsiorwriters.com


Please read the case carefully.Questions from 1-6 come from the case.

William Rosenberg opened the first Dunkin Donuts in Quincy, Massachusetts, in 1950. Residents

flocked to his store each morning for the coffee and fresh doughnuts. Rosenberg started

franchising the Dunkin’ Donuts name and the chain grew rapidly throughout the Midwest and

Southeast. By the early 1990s, however, Dunkin’ was losing breakfast sales to morning

sandwiches at McDonald’s and Burger King. Starbucks and other high-end cafes began sprouting

up, bringing more competition. Sales slid as the company clung to its strategy of selling sugary

doughnuts by the dozen.

In the mid-90s, however, Dunkin shifted its focus from doughnuts to coffee in the hope that

promoting a more frequently consumed item would drive store traffic. The coffee push workeddoughnuts make up a mere 17 % of sales. Dunkin’ sells 2.7 million cups of coffee a day, nearly

one billion cups a year. And, Dunkin’ sales have surged 40 % during the past four years. Based on

this recent success, Dunkin’ now has ambitious plans to expand into a national coffee

powerhouse, on a par with Starbucks, the nation’s largest coffee chain. Over the next few years,

Dunkin’ plans to remake its more than 5,400 US shops in 34 states and grow to double that

number by 2020.

But Dunkin’ is not Starbucks. In fact, it does not want to be. To succeed, Dunkin must have its

own clear vision of just which customers it wants to serve (target segment) and how (value

proposition). Dunkin’ gut feeling is that Dunkin’ and Starbucks target very different customers,

who want very different things from their favorite coffee shops. Starbucks is strongly positioned

as a sort of highbrow third place – outside of home and office – featuring couches, eclectic music,

wireless internet access, and art splashed walls. Dunkin’ has decidedly lowbrow, everyman kind

of positioning.

With its makeover, Dunkin plans to move upscale – a bit but not too far – to reposition itself as a

quick but appealing alternative to specialty coffee shops and fast-food chains. Yes, Dunkin’ built

itself on serving simple fare to working class customers. Inching upscale without alienating that

base will prove tricky.

Newly appointed Dunkin’ CMO, Tony Weisman, wants to conduct a marketing research study.

They currently do not know which steps to take to come up with a clear understanding of which

direction they should take. This is why approached you.


Question #1: Dunkin’ will be conducting a marketing research project (15 pts) and they are

asking you

(a) What are the steps of a typical marketing research project ? (customize the steps for the

Dunkin’ case)

(b) Please discuss why it is essential to start the research process with the right question


(c) What is the primary research question in this Dunkin’ case? What does Dunkin’ want to

know? Please provide an elaborate answer.

There are 5 more questions attached below. thank you so much!


South Striving to Reduce Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections – excelsiorwriters.com

Science – excelsiorwriters.com

Below are the instructions for the capstone project paper. I have also attached a running accumulation of work over the course of 8 weeks that has been done to lead up to the final project. Hopefully this document will be kind of helpful in formulating a paper. As you can see, the capstone’s PICOT is listed below as well. There are several references listed in the attached document that need to be used for the project as well. Paper must be written in APA format. Must use in-text citations (please quote correctly). Please be mindful of grammar, punctuation, and use of proper English. I have also attached a grading rubric as well.

Submit EBP project with Implementation Plan and Evaluation Plan.Note EBP plan should resemble plan on page 248 of the Melnyk text. This is your final capstone Master’s level paper. Required Headings for the paper are listed below:

Headings in the EBP Paper:

Cultivate a Spirit of Inquiry

Clinical PICOT Question

Literature Review: The most relevant best evidence.

Critically appraisal of the Evidence

Project implementation

Evaluation of Outcomes

Disseminate the outcomes of the EBP decision or change.



PICOT: In hospitalized geriatric patients (P), does incorporating educational strategies into the patient’s plan of care and use of medicated urinary catheter (I), compared to use of a medicated urinary catheter alone (C), decrease incidence of inpatient catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI’s) (O) over a three-month period (T).


human exceptionalities – excelsiorwriters.com

Humanities – excelsiorwriters.com

M5 Discussion 1: The Level Playing Field

The Level Playing Field

President Clinton signing a bill to enhance the education children with disabilities are receiving

Few concepts seem to be more embraced by most people than that of the “level playing field.” Yet the notion of reasonable accommodation in providing services for students with disabilities continues to be controversial, especially in higher education.

What is “reasonable accommodation?” Who should decide, and based on what ‘evidence?’ Craft a response that reflects your point of view, and respond to at least 2 other posts. Provide a research finding that support your point of view. Remember to cite your resources.